Sept. 9, 2021

heroic mario syndrome

It’s interesting how memory changes the way I view works of fiction. For instance, Baldr Sky certainly had its high points, but when I think back on it, I mostly remember the bad stuff—the repetitive routes, the endless school flashbacks that got repeated in reminiscence mode. Conversely, there was a whole lot of junk in Subahibi, but I mostly remember the funny parts: Takuji x desk-chan, Kimiko volunteering to be a chair, “where’s Nishimura?” I think of Subahibi a lot more warmly in retrospect than when I was actually playing the game.

You could say time distorts things, but I don’t see it that way. I think time clarifies things. My long-term opinion (of a game, book, etc.) is a truer rating than my initial post-read gut feeling. It’s like standing the test of time. If something is genuinely great, I’m going to remember it warmly years later. On the other hand, if I enjoy something while reading it, but it doesn’t leave much of a lasting impression, or its flaws loom larger in retrospect, it can’t have been that great.

Heroic Mario is a good example of this. You can’t tell how much HM likes a game right after he beats it, it’s just always going to be his new #1. You have to wait six months and see: Is it still in his top 10? His top 20? Or did it vanish completely?

(lmao remember his 17-post essay on Cloud Strife, those were the days)

I have a bit of Heroic Mario syndrome. After making an initial rating, my first adjustment tends to be downward. (Most often from 4 stars to 3.5 stars. 3.5 is still a positive rating for me; it means the book was good, but not special/outstanding.) For this reason, I generally hesitate to give any book a perfect 5 unless I’ve read at least one other good book in between.

Written by Achaius

Log in to Like
Log In to Favorite
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

You must be signed in to post a comment!